Photo by Blake Wisz on Unsplash
Tarif pajak dan keuntungan serta kerugian negara yang didukung oleh Stripe
| Nama dalam bahasa Mandarin | English Name | Tax Rate | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Australia | 30% (small businesses 25%) | Stable economic environment, highly developed infrastructure | High cost of living, complex tax compliance requirements |
| Austria | Austria | 25% | Central European location, high quality of life and education system | High tax burden, cumbersome administrative procedures |
| Belgia | Belgium | 25% | Sound economic system, multilingual environment | High tax rates and social security costs, complex tax system |
| Brasil | Brazil | approximately 34% | Large market potential, abundant resources | Complex tax system, challenging business environment |
| Bulgaria | Bulgaria | 10% | Low corporate tax rate, relatively low costs | Slow economic development, infrastructure needs improvement |
| Kanada | Canada | approximately 15%-30% | Stable political and economic environment, multicultural | High cost of living and tax burden |
| Kroasia | Croatia | 18% (small businesses 12%) | EU member, beautiful natural environment | Low administrative efficiency |
| Siprus | Cyprus | 12.5% | Low tax policies that attract foreign investment, widespread use of English | Risk of political instability |
| Republik Ceko | Czech Republic | 19% | Central European location, abundant technical talent | Competitive labor market |
| Denmark | Denmark | approximately 22% | High quality of life and social welfare system | High tax burden and cost of living |
| Estonia | Estonia | Exempt from tax on undistributed profits, 20% when distributed | High degree of digitalization, innovation-friendly environment | Small market size |
| Finlandia | Finland | approximately 20% | Highly developed education system and technical infrastructure | High cost of living |
| Prancis | France | approximately 25% | Large market, government support for innovation and R&D activities | Complex tax system and heavy burden |
| Jerman | Germany | approximately 30% | Largest economy in Europe, leader in technical innovation | High labor costs |
| Ghana | Ghana | approximately 25% | Great potential for economic growth, strong market openness | Insufficient infrastructure |
| Gibraltar | Gibraltar | approximately 10% | Low corporate tax rate policies that attract foreign investment | High cost of living and limited market size |
| Yunani | Greece | approximately 22% | High quality of life and developed tourism industry | Risk of political and economic instability |
| Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 16.5% | Simplified tax system, no VAT | High market competition, certain restrictions for foreign companies |
| Hungaria | Hungary | 9% | Lowest corporate tax rate in Europe, attracts foreign investment | Cumbersome administrative procedures, unstable labor market |
| India | India | approximately 25%-30% | Large market potential, abundant technical talent | Complex tax system, high compliance requirements |
| Indonesia | Indonesia | approximately 22% | Great potential in emerging markets, large consumer base | Insufficient infrastructure, challenging business environment |
| Irlandia | Ireland | 12.5% | Low tax policies that attract foreign investment, concentration of high-tech industries | High cost of living, intense market competition |
| Italia | Italy | approximately 24% | Large market and rich talent pool | High tax burden, low administrative efficiency |
| Jepang | Japan | approximately 23.2% | Technologically advanced and large consumer base | High market entry barriers, intense competition |
| Kenya | Kenya | approximately 30% | Great potential in emerging markets, large young population | Insufficient infrastructure, challenging business environment |
| Latvia | Latvia | 20% | EU member, convenient trade | Small market size, relatively slow economic development |
| Liechtenstein | Liechtenstein | 12.5% | Favorable tax system and stable political environment | Small market size |
| Lithuania | Lithuania | 15% | Growing tech industry, multicultural | Cumbersome administrative procedures |
| Luksemburg | Luxembourg | approximately 24.94% | Favorable policies that attract foreign investment | High cost of living |
| Malaysia | Malaysia | approximately 24% | Great potential in emerging markets, friendly investment environment | Relatively complex legal and compliance requirements |
| Malta | Malta | 35% (can effectively be reduced to 5%) | Low effective tax rate that attracts foreign investment, no dividend tax, simplified company establishment processes | High company establishment costs, must meet specific conditions to enjoy low tax rates |
| Meksiko | Mexico | 28% | Large market potential, favorable geographic location | Complex tax system, cumbersome administrative procedures |
| Belanda | Netherlands | 20% (small businesses 25.8%) | Open business environment, good infrastructure | High cost of living |
| Selandia Baru | New Zealand | 28% | Stable economic environment, highly developed infrastructure | High cost of living |
| Nigeria | Nigeria | approximately 30% | Great potential in emerging markets, large young population | Insufficient infrastructure, challenging business environment |
| Norwegia | Norway | 22% | High quality of life and social welfare system | High tax burden |
| Poland | Poland | 19% | EU member, convenient trade | Cumbersome administrative procedures |
| Portugal | Portugal | 12.5%-27.5% | Active innovation policies and attractiveness for foreign investment | High cost of living |
| Rumania | Romania | 16% | EU member, large market potential | Low administrative efficiency |
| Singapura | Singapore | 17% | Stable economic environment, low tax rate that attracts foreign investment | Intense market competition, high cost of living |
| Slovakia | Slovakia | 21% | EU member, convenient trade | Cumbersome administrative procedures, small market size |
| Slovenia | Slovenia | 19% | Stable economic environment, good quality of life | High tax burden and cost of living |
| Afrika Selatan | South Africa | approximately 28% | Great market potential, abundant resources | High tax compliance requirements, political risk |
| Spanyol | Spain | approximately 25% | Large market, government support for innovation and R&D activities | Complex tax system and heavy burden |
| Swedia | Sweden | approximately 22% | High quality of life and social welfare system | High tax burden |
| Swiss | Switzerland | approximately 15%-24% | Stable economic environment, attracts foreign investment | High cost of living, complex tax system |
| Thailand | Thailand | 20% | Great potential in emerging markets, developed tourism industry | Cumbersome administrative procedures, insufficient infrastructure |
| Uni Emirat Arab | United Arab Emirates | 0% | No corporate tax, attracts foreign investment | High market competition, dependence on oil economy |
| Inggris | United Kingdom | 19% | Stable legal environment, good business infrastructure | Increased market uncertainty after Brexit |
| Amerika Serikat | United States | approximately 21% (federal tax) | Large market, leader in technological innovation | Complex tax system, large differences in tax rates between states |